Technology Advantage

Part One of ESI Basics: PSTs

May 8th, 2018
Part One of ESI Basics: PSTs

This is Part One of a continuing series on ESI basics. In this series, we will cover some of the terms used most often on the tech-side of e-discovery. Whether this is an introduction to you or a refresher, and whether you are an attorney, member of an in-house team or data analyst, this information may come in handy in your practice.

PST Files

We work with PST files and e-mail messages almost every day. But what are PST files?  Why are they important?  And how should we handle them?

When we collect email messages for the purposes of e-discovery, they most often come in the form of PST files.  PST files are container files that hold e-mail messages, attachments, calendar items and other Outlook items, all compressed and organized in a mini database. These PST files even have encryption options! Over the years, PST files have become a very convenient method for transporting e-mail messages in bulk to law firms and attorneys so they can be processed and reviewed by case teams.

The Genesis of PSTs

The PST, or Personal Storage Table, was designed by Microsoft in the mid-1990s to hold e-mail messages and other items for its Outlook application. PSTs were considered a brilliant innovation at a time when server storage space was really expensive as they allowed users to take e-mail items off the server and store them locally on personal computer hard drives. This innovation not only solved the space problem; it also allowed users - at a time of unreliable dial-up Internet connections - to connect to the e-mail server, download e-mail and review offline at their own pace. How cool was that? In the ‘90s that was super cool!

Are PST Files Perfect?

Unfortunately, nothing is perfect. While PSTs were a brilliant innovation in the ‘90s, technology and the Internet, along with business, evolved. When handled improperly, PSTs can be a liability because they are easily corrupted. 

PSTs: Handle With Care Lest You Corrupt!

PSTs were not designed to be accessed on a shared network and attempting to review email messages stored this way may cause corruption. Further, PSTs were designed to be accessed by a single user and attempted access by multiple users may also cause corruption.

While corrupted PSTs can often be repaired, repair attempts may alter e-mail messages. Further, processing options like deduplication may not properly function with repaired PSTs. Even worse, repairing PSTs may inadvertently result in spoliation.

How to Properly Handle PST Files?

Don’t run the risk of corrupting PSTs and spoliating evidence by trying to view the e-mail messages through your own Outlook. The ramifications of altering content and metadata are far-reaching and the risks are too great. Have the PSTs properly processed first, and then review the e-mail messages in Relativity or another review tool with robust search, redaction and production options.

 

DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this blog is not intended as legal advice or as an opinion on specific facts. For more information about these issues, please contact the author(s) of this blog or your existing LitSmart contact. The invitation to contact the author is not to be construed as a solicitation for legal work. Any new attorney/client relationship will be confirmed in writing.

Topics: E-Discovery Email Spoliation Data Collection PSTs Data Processing Relativity

Subscribe to the E-Discovery Newsletter

Related Posts

  • Data Mapping - Why is it Important for Successful E-Discovery?

    A data map is usually something that is generated along with a data retention plan and is a great starting point if and when an organization becomes involved in litigation and discovery. Long before litigation and discovery, however, it is important to understand the relevant data sources that may be in play and where those can be found within the organization’s various data systems. This blog explains what a data map is, what it contains and how it is helpful.

  • Pitfalls of Complex Search Protocols in ESI Agreements

    ESI Agreements cover the full gambit of e-discovery issues, from preservation expectations to production specifications. Sometimes, these agreements include an overview of the process by which the parties will identify the universe of potentially responsive documents by using specific date ranges, identifying priority custodians and developing proposed search terms. Adding another layer of complexity, this discussion is often had in a vacuum before the parties even know how much data their clients have. Coming up with criteria that identifies the relevant documents, but is not overly broad, in this vacuum can be difficult. However, the process is important because the date range, custodians and terms will inevitably dictate how much data is collected, processed and reviewed, which can significantly affect any litigation budget.

Newest Posts

  • Planting the Seeds of Accountability for Spoliation Sanctions

    When seeking sanctions for spoliated evidence, the nature of the evidence and your jurisdiction can play a pivotal role. Are you in state or federal court? Is the missing evidence electronically stored information or not? The same facts and circumstances could yield vastly different outcomes depending on the answers to those questions. It is important to recognize up front, at the start of your case, how your jurisdiction may impact discovery issues that could arise later down the road so that you can plan accordingly. In the case in this post, while the court did not ultimately affirm the imposition of an adverse jury instruction for spoliation of evidence, it did find a duty to preserve existed based not only on the parties’ contract, but on evidence the party in question had promised to preserve such evidence. By contrast, the insurers failed to demonstrate that same party owed them a duty to preserve. 

  • You’re Gonna Need A Bigger Boat: Data Management and E Discovery Strategy

    “You’re gonna need a bigger boat.” 

    This iconic line was uttered by Chief Brody in the 1975 blockbuster film Jaws when he first saw the massive size of the shark they were trying to catch. At that moment, Brody realized they were in completely over their heads, and the boat they had was not big enough to accomplish their task. While Quint’s Orca fishing boat and his traditional methods were capable of handling previous assignments, they were not going to be enough to take on the enormous shark they were chasing. 

    For better or worse, the digital environment we live in has resulted in an explosion in the number of documents and amount of information created and used by companies in their daily operations. A mid-sized company’s internal emails alone can run into the tens of thousands a day, and that is before factoring in reports, meeting minutes, studies, presentations, and other business documents. Adding in external emails and related attachments, you are looking at millions of documents a year. Because of this increased volume of data, companies dealing with potential litigation must adjust accordingly. 

    Like Brody, they need a bigger boat. An effective e-discovery strategy can provide companies with a bigger boat capable of handling even the most massive litigation matters.

  • Now You See Me, Now You Don’t: Ephemeral Messaging Challenges

    The emergence of ephemeral messaging applications to communicate with friends, family, and coworkers quickly, securely, and effortlessly has boomed over the past decade. In that time, users of ephemeral messaging apps have risen significantly, from millions to billions of active users! Ephemeral messaging is an integral and evolving part of both individual and company communications with advantages and challenges impacting companies and the legal industry. Companies must consider the ramifications of their employees' use of ephemeral messaging and adopt policies and procedures to best protect themselves and comply with requirements relating to litigation and regulation. Courts have already begun addressing the failure to preserve relevant ephemeral messages and have been issuing sanctions in a myriad of legal challenges. Ephemeral messaging is here to stay, and companies, courts, and attorneys must understand and adapt to evolve with this emerging technology.